Editor’s Note: This is the 21st review in our Get Paid to Read contest series! If you missed last week, we featured Irrational Exuberance by

Editor’s Note: This is the 20th review in our Get Paid to Read contest series! If you missed last week, we featured Maxwell Austin’s review

Editor’s Note: Welcome to the 19th review in our Get Paid to Read contest series! Previously, Vasu Golyan shared his thoughts on Too Big to

Editor’s Note: Welcome to the 18th review in our Get Paid to Read contest series! Last week Ross Brittain shared his thoughts on The Snowball:

Editor’s Note: Welcome to the 17th review in our Get Paid to Read contest series! Last week, we featured Tom Vouvoudakis’ review of Against the

Editor’s Note: Welcome to the 16th review in our Get Paid to Read contest series! Last week, we featured William Somers’s take on One Up

Editor’s Note: This is the 15th book review we are publishing as part of our Get Paid to Read contest. Last week, we published The

Editor’s Note: This is the 14th book review we are publishing as part of our Get Paid to Read contest. Last week, we published  Active

Editor’s Note: This is the 13th book review we are publishing as part of our Get Paid to Read contest. Last week, we published Market

Editor’s Note: This is the 12th book review we are publishing as part of our Get Paid to Read contest. Last week, I wrote a

After publishing 11 book reviews that were submitted by participants of our Get Paid to Read Contest, I figured I would write a review of

Editor’s Note: A few years before Daniel Kahneman’s Thinking, Fast and Slow was released, the imagination of investors was captured by another more accessible book